Given is a line graph illustrating some pointed information regarding to smoking habits of both men and women in Someland from 1960 to 2000. It can be clearly seen that men are more likely to smoke than women.
Looking at the chart, the rate of males who smoked in Someland reveals an apparently downward trend during the given period. In 1960, the number of men that smoked is 600 and it still remained to be the highest rate according to the figures. The number then gradually declined throughout the years and reached 250 in 2000.
It is interesting to note that women, in contrast to men, witnessed some significant fluctuation from 1960 to 1980 and have a slightly decrease from 2980 to 2000. In more detail, from about 100 in 1960, the number of women that smoked soared considerably to over 300 in 1975, this is the only upward trend however. After the increase, the number saw a marked reduction from 300 to exactly 200 in 2000.
It is true that the descending tendency of the rate reveals that Someland can completely manage this negative habit, which is a positive fact.
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people 56
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people 84
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Task 2 Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender
- IELTS Task 1Topic Rates of smoking in Someland 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... fluctuation from 1960 to 1980 and have a slightly decrease from 2980 to 2000. In more detail, from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, look, regarding, so, still, then, in contrast, in contrast to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68586387435 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48533981782 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7762237382 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16988972367 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753030424364 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645259803831 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115305649598 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590122378868 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.