The table below gives information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009.
The table compares the proportion in each sectors in the government expenditure in three countries namely Germany, Italy and UK in 2009.
As an overview, health sector accounted nearly the same stable rate in all three countries, while the least expenditure was environmental protection in 2009.
According to the table, public service was really high at Italy and Germany with was the highest in Italy and the second highest in Germany, in UK, this sector just accounted for 4,6% in government expenditure in 2009. Health was at approximately 7% in all three countries, and was the highest proportion in Germany and UK. While Education was take more attention in UK, it stood at 6,4% and was the second sector that government focus much on, this sector just take about 4% in the others. Economic affairs stood at around 4% in three countries. Finally, environmental protection was not be focused much that the percentage was just under 1% with 0.7% in Germany, 0.9% in Italy and 1% in UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | JayV109 | 49 | view |
- it is important to be concerned about international events even if those events have no direct impact on our lives 78
- critically evaluate whether the cause of delinquent behavior in teenagers is mainly genetic or environmental Analyze the effects this behavior has on society 78
- the graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four countries in 2002 71
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time working 87
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, really, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93452380952 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.749046423 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2241722953 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187345094212 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104970720966 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973269883112 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172164392878 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891525910035 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.