The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The charts illustrate the information about the income and the percentage of expenses for food and clothes in 5 different categories of a family in a city belonging to UK between 2010 and 2013.
Overall, it is obvious that the income of an average family decreased while there was an increase in the amount of money spent on food and clothes by them. Additionally, spending on food including fruits, vegetables, meat and fish was in the majority.
In the term of the amount of money a family earned, this figure was $29.000 in 2010 which was as high as in 2013 represented at $25.000. Nevertheless, expenses on food and clothes of a household saw an increased of $1.000 from $ 14.000 to $15.000 between 2010 and 2013.
In the term of the proportion of the amount of money spent on food and clothes, 20% expenses of a family in a UK city was spent on fruits and vegetables in 2010 which was a sharp decline in comparison with these expenses in 2013 represented 35%. For the amount of money for meat and fish of a family, this figure were 25% and 15% respectively in the period from 2010 to 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | To Rang | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | dattien | 61 | view |
- The chart illustrates the proportion of males and females living in a province and using bicycles in 5 different age groups in 2011. 73
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg tp adult fish. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a household saw an increased of .000 from $ 14.000 to 5.000 between 2010 and ...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$14'.
Suggestion: $14
...ousehold saw an increased of .000 from $ 14.000 to 5.000 between 2010 and 2013. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51256281407 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65020753904 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452261306533 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3187712642 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333224481347 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165336222395 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103316101702 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227684863888 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905620814913 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.