The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was
seen from 2007 to 2008, with oil prices reaching a
peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the
food price index rising to 220 points. However, by
the beginning of 2009 the price of oil had dropped
by roughly $90, and the food price index was
down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the
average oil price rose once again, to nearly $100
per barrel, while the food price index reached its
peak, at almost 240 points.
The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was
seen from 2007 to 2008, with oil prices reaching a
peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the
food price index rising to 220 points. However, by
the beginning of 2009 the price of oil had dropped
by roughly $90, and the food price index was
down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the
average oil price rose once again, to nearly $100
per barrel, while the food price index reached its
peak, at almost 240 points.
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
- The pie charts above depict the median ages of Yemeni and Italian citizens in 2000 and predictions in 2050.It is well-defined from the charts that kids, teenagers and adults under 60 years old account for most of Yemen’s population both in 2000 and 2050 73
- It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.Th 78
- The pie charts above give a percentage of the Parkway Hotel’s customer service rating in 2005 and 2010.It is clear from the chart that the number of visitors who rated for the service satisfactory, poor or very poor decreased significantly in 2010. Wher 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73933649289 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26946432409 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526066350711 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5466440166 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 3.83414634146 626% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.588345710663 0.215688989381 273% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.306761018579 0.103423049105 297% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162373401315 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184300445033 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141039468062 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.