The line chart above compares the number of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden, and America.
It is clear from the chart that the three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in the early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden, and the United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and the USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and the USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
The line chart above compares the number of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden, and America.
It is clear from the chart that the three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in the early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden, and the United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and the USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and the USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
- The line graph above illustrates variations in the average prices of food and oil on a global scale in 11 years from 2000 to 2011.Overall, there’re striking similarities in the way two values change through over one decade, which show the clearest diff 73
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go 73
- The pie charts above give a percentage about water consumption in San Diego County, California and the rest of the world. It is clear from the chart that both San Diego and California consume the most water for residential demand while global population u 73
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
- The line chart above demonstrates the average number of people travelling long distances to work by car of public transports, bus and train in particular, in the UK from 1970 to 2030.It is clear that there were and will be significant changes in the numbe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above compares the number of old people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54166666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52066115114 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3220046035 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.657618810865 0.215688989381 305% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3055067586 0.103423049105 295% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.271803211769 0.0843802449381 322% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.463081609188 0.15604864568 297% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.225850396047 0.0819641961636 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.