Line graph
The line graph illustrates the information about the changes in employment pattern in USA in different field namely industrial, sales and office, farming, fishing and foresting, technical and other services in between 1930 to 2010.
Firstly, in 1930, majority of American was engaged in farming, fishing and foresting which was nearly 80 but after then this number fell gradually till 1970 and reached to 60 while, sudden fell can be seen till 2010 and went to nearly 1. Furthermore, nearly 10 people employed in sale and office in 1930, with some fluctuation this number reached to 20 at the end of 2010.
Secondly, no scope can be seen for industrial employment until 1950. After 1950, there was little scope in 1960 while, after then employment rate was slowly increased and went to nearly 40 till 2010. Moreover, there was less employment available in technical field in 1930 but until 2010, with gradual increment this number reached to approximately 30. However, with some little change, the number was stayed as it is for other services, which was nearly 20 all over the year.
Overall, there were less employment available in farming, fishing and foresting while all field shows increase trend in employment.
- It is absolutely true fact that people cannot imagine their lives without music It totally interferes in each sphere of human life What are the most popular music styles today Discuss this point of view and give your personal opinion 78
- Pie Chart 67
- Pie chart and table 67
- A hundred years ago people thought that human race was steadily improving in every area of life Now it seems this is not certain in all situations In which areas do you think we have made important progress nowadays In which areas do you think we still ne 61
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly 30. However, with some little change, the number was stayed as it is for other...
^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'all' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'alls'.
Suggestion: alls
...for other services, which was nearly 20 all over the year. Overall, there were l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09950248756 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56621911719 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0858679405 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0508861525503 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262194245348 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693700768382 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524388490696 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908267508789 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.