The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

the line graph provides the information about number of visitors per month for three museums during summer(June to September), 2013. Overall, The British Museum stayed on top with most visitors throughout the summer of 2013.

Science Museum stayed under 400 visitors every month and on a constant decline for most part of summer, only to rise during August and September, to reach peak visitors just crossing 400 mark. The number of visitors to natural history museum are not far off when compared to number of visitors to the science museum, just staying within the band 300-600 each month. The natural history museum saw peak visitors at the start of summer, more than 500 visitors in June. Natural history museum had more visitors overall on average than the science museum.

British museum saw its peak in the month of July crossing 700 visitors. On average this museum received more than 500 visitors every single month, which was the highest than the average of other two museums.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph provides the information abo...
^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'September 2013'.
Suggestion: September 2013
... for three museums during summerJune to September, 2013. Overall, The British Museum stayed on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19462570883 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5013502861 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281048937002 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147748341723 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109486040419 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21419303111 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128162796398 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.