The line graph below shows the average carbon dioxide ( C02) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph depicts how the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in four countries include: the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, over a 40-year period, commencing from 1967.
Overall, while the UK and Sweden underwent a downward trend over the period shown, the opposite was true for Italy and Portugal. Throughout the period, the UK constantly receiving the highest figures.
In the beginning year of the period, the UK and Sweden recorded the highest numbers with 11 and nearly nine tonnes, respectively. Over the next ten years, there was a moderate increase in the figure of the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in Sweden to approximately 11 tonnes, followed by a dramatic fall to roughly six tonnes in 2007. Meanwhile, throughout the same 40-year period, the figure for the UK experienced a gradual decline to nearly nine tonnes.
Turning to the statistics for Italy and Portugal, they came in third and fourth place in 1967, with approximately four and one tonnes. During the next period of 40 years, figures for Italy showed a sharp rise to roughly eight tonnes in 2007. Likewise, the statistics for Portugal witnessed a steep growth to more than five tonnes.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 word 56
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08585858586 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60786583001 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1059330854 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26015848997 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10026303333 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119692637149 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169212889347 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128768225258 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.