The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The line graph presents the Australian teenagers’ habit of fast food consumption between 1975 and 2000. As can be seen, the trend of fish and chips was downward, while those of hamburgers and Pizza were upward.
Starting at 100 times in 1975, the consumption of fish and chips had an upward fluctuation between 1975 and 1985. However, the figure suddenly declined to under 40 times during the period from 1985 to 2000. On the other hand, there was a significant increase in the number of hamburgers was eaten between 1975 and 1985. And the figure climbed until it surpassed that of fish and chips in 1985. In the rest of the period, it continued to grow slightly and reached the peak of over 100 times. On the other side, the consumption rate of pizza witnessed a gradual rise from under 10 times to over 60 times between 1975 and 1990, and then the rate exceeded that of fish and chips. In the second half of the period, it continued to rise and then remained steady at over 80 times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-21 | sinisterchill9 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | Jenna Vu | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | kwuynh | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Tabassum Zaman | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | lwof | 82 | view |
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 61
- Writing Task 2 Children should always follow their parents advice To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 74
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54748603352 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3620782959 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0057465571 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114920536777 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555526076226 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829175261274 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117825544316 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511572808932 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.