The line graph displays rates of household recycling in the UK, France and Germany between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the UK and Germany did a remarkable upsurge in the number of household recycling rates throughout a decade. In contrast, although starting with the highest rate, France is now the lowest of the three.
In 2005, France stood first in recycling rates with 50% rates, while the UK and Germany were lower, about nearly 35% and 20% respectively. France’s rate dropped dramatically and reached a low point at 30% in 2013, and then slowly returned to 40% in 2015.
Compared with France, the volume in the UK continuously went up by 25%, reaching 60% in 2015. Following the same pattern as the UK, the percentage of household recycling in Germany jumped over with a triple increase, soaring from 20% to slightly below 60% in 2015. It can be seen that the most significant growth of the household recycling rates is in Germany, which is far ahead of the other two nations.
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents 87
- the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 72
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries. 80
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85882352941 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65851117374 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8834784546 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32404700617 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149421388449 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126667681779 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235458598492 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139065572923 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.