The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The graph illustrates how the rates of the household recycling varied in three different countries over a period of 10 years. It’s obvious to see that the UK and Germany did remarkably on recycling during the period from 2005 to 2015, and the recycling rate in France declined for nearly a decade before a rise afterward.
As manifested in the graph, in France, the rate was 50% in 2005, indicating that families did great waste disposal. It dropped slightly and reached a low point at 30% in 2013, and then slowly returned to 40% in 2015. Afterwards, there was a noticeable change: the recycling rate in France started to go down year by year while those in the UK and Germany increased steadily.
Compared with France, the percentages in the other two countries were low –at 20% and 35% in the UK and Germany respectively. The volume in the UK continuously went up by 25%, reaching 60% in 2015. Germany had a significant growth with a triple increase, from 20% to 60%. Similarly, between 2009 and 2011, both the UK and Germany had a dramatic upward trend and rocketed by over 15%.
According to the graph, it can be seen the most significant growth of the household recycling rate is in Germany, which is far ahead of the other two nations.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 61
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009. 84
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67446461932 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7704911273 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286511840506 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103479869216 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983622073046 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17149906717 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10461591201 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.