The line graph illustrate the regional household recycling rates in the UK, France and Germany from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the recycling rates of the Uk and France showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while the percentage of recycled waste in france experienced a downward trend.
With regards to the percentage of recycling rates in Germany, it begins at around 20% in 2005 and then increased sharply throughout the period, exceeding france's rate in 2009 and reaching almost 60% in the end of the period. Likewise, approximately 35% of waste were recycled at UK in the starting year and in the final year it peaked up to 60% respectively.
In the early 2005, the recycling rate of france was 50% which is the highest among there three countries.However, it dramatically decreased to 30% in 2013. Then, there was a growth of 10% in the final year, but according to the figure the recycling rates of france was approximately lowest.
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s actions. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment.why is this happening and what measures can be tackle this problem. 67
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period, while the percentage of recycled waste in france experienced a downward t...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...the highest among there three countries.However, it dramatically decreased to 30% in 20...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91975308642 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92619288254 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9909898939 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182535020746 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106279261608 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742936450293 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135668536115 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722400064244 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.