The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.

The line graph depicts the information about the number of visitors to four attractions of Brighton in England.

A glance at graph reveals that, the number of visitors to pavilion and pier had increased , in contrast visitors to Art Gallery and Festival had declined over a period of time. Visitors for pavilion increased till 1995, then it decreased by 2000. Visitor trend for Festival remained plateau with barely remarkable changes. Visitor for Art Gallery increased till 1985 and then fallen down. Despite of having lots of fluctuations trend for pier increased by 2000.

Arty gallery(just above 20%) and pier visitor(10%) increased by 1985 to 37% and 15% respectively. Pavilion and festival had diverged till they met 27% in 1985 and then again they diverged their way. pavilion reached to just below 50% by 1995 and then fallen down to just above 30 by 2010. Festival maintained a balanced trend with negligible changes and reached 27% by 2010. In 2005 pier and Art galley trend merged at 15% and diverged their way. Pier increased seamlessly to just below 20 and art gallery fallen down to just below 10.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itors to pavilion and pier had increased , in contrast visitors to Art Gallery and...
^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...allery and Festival had declined over a period of time. Visitors for pavilion increased till ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1995, then it decreased by 2000. Visitor trend for Festival remained plateau wit...
^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it decreased by 2000. Visitor trend for Festival remained plateau with barely re...
^^
Line 8, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pavilion
...and then again they diverged their way. pavilion reached to just below 50% by 1995 and t...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98395721925 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54264221334 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48128342246 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6860399653 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844972306673 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398781632059 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926384302361 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129376522109 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147968938789 0.0819641961636 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.