The line graph below shows the population size, birth and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The chart illustrates the size of the population of England and Wales as well as their fatality and fertility rate in a period of three centuries spanning from 1700 to 2000.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, the death rate underwent a downward trend while the population size experienced an upheaval. In the meantime, the ratio of birth rate fluctuated throughout the years.
The patterns of death and birth quotas had a lot in common. In 1700, they reached 26 and 30 respectively. Fifty years later, the numbers rocketed; then, from 1750 to 1800, they plateaued at 36 and 40 orderly. The fertility and fatality rates nosedived in the subsequent period; after that, from 1850 to 1900, they remained seamless. However, while death figures continued to decrease, its counterpart galloped suddenly to 34 at the end of the period.
Meanwhile, population size rose rapidly. Initially, it was about two million people, then the figure experienced positive growth from 1700-1750 and went down later. Then, the number kept soaring precipitously to circa fifty million in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | dangcongkhai | 65 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | stanie calitex | 78 | view |
- Should we discourage people to use cars 84
- Children should be listened 89
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given Write at least 150 words
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows children by age group as a percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 89
- People suggest increasing taxes on processed products to improve people s health What do you think 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14124293785 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73532694023 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5804442907 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7272727273 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212847030933 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766890519848 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487356571348 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135933590325 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467859075939 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.