The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The provided line graph illustrates the information about the population density, natality and mortality rate of England and Wales during three centuries. In general, it is clearly apparent that the figures of population showed an upward trend while both birth and death rate identically followed a fluctuate pattern.

Looking in more detail from the chart, in 1700, the total of inhabitants in England and Wales counted at around 2.5 millions of people with the birth and death rate at 30 and 27 per 1000 people. In the next fifty years all the parameters increased by 7.5 millions people for inhabitants and by 10 per 1000 people for both birth and death rate. Indistinguishably, during 1750 to 1800, all the parameters reported to be unchanged. However, after that, the number of population started to raised dramatically up to 50 millions people in 2000. On the other hand, the figures of those who passed away declined gradually at 20 per mil people although there were two plateaus during 1850 to 1900 and 1950 to 2000. Similar but not identical pattern also found in the number of born rate. However, the rate of babies delivered were jump considerably by 10 per mil people from 1950 to 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rth and death rate identically followed a fluctuate pattern. Looking in more detail from...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...n England and Wales counted at around 2.5 millions of people with the birth and death rate at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
.... However, the rate of babies delivered were jump considerably by 10 per mil people ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'jumped'.
Suggestion: jumped
...ever, the rate of babies delivered were jump considerably by 10 per mil people from ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89705882353 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69707200943 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5130858149 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266917204655 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108116474844 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693404534732 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23090308245 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538512236409 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.