The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was
seen from 2007 to 2008, with oil prices reaching a
peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the
food price index rising to 220 points. However, by
the beginning of 2009 the price of oil had dropped
by roughly $90, and the food price index was
down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the
average oil price rose once again, to nearly $100
per barrel, while the food price index reached its
peak, at almost 240 points.
The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was
seen from 2007 to 2008, with oil prices reaching a
peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the
food price index rising to 220 points. However, by
the beginning of 2009 the price of oil had dropped
by roughly $90, and the food price index was
down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the
average oil price rose once again, to nearly $100
per barrel, while the food price index reached its
peak, at almost 240 points.
- The line chart above illustrates the population proportion at the age of 65 and beyond of Japan, Sweden and the USA in a-hundred-year time from 1940 to 2040.It is clear that the population aged 65 and above ratio of Sweden and the USA shows around 50% sim 67
- The line graph above gives information on average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is evident that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities we 78
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- The line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 whil 78
- The line graph compares the average price of abarrel of oil with the food price index over aperiod of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil andfood rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.Furthermore, the trends for both commoditiesw 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73933649289 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26946432409 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526066350711 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5466440166 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 3.83414634146 626% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.588345710663 0.215688989381 273% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.306761018579 0.103423049105 297% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162373401315 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184300445033 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141039468062 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.