The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007, in grams.
Given is the line graph contrasting the quantity of 3 discrete kinds of spreads consumed over a period of 26 years, commencing from 1981.
It is perceptible that there was an exponential plunge for almost all of the products, apart from low fat and reduced spreads. Furthermore, this spreads vaguely became by far the most favored product in 2007, albeit the low consumption rate in 1996.
When it comes to butter consumption, it swelled to a zenith of approximately 160 grams in 1986 and henceforth slumped to 50 grams within the next recorded years. Likewise, that of butter fluctuated from 80 to 100 grams in the first 10 registered years, followed by a 5-year plateau before slipping down to merely 40 grams in the ensuing years.
Notwithstanding being purchased later on the market, low fat and reduced spreads achieved a ceaseless leap in its consumption from a low quantity of 10 grams in 1996 to its highest of 82 grams in 2001, which slumped by 10 grams in the final years.
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard peers have more of an impact than teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today 76
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...re was an exponential plunge for almost all of the products, apart from low fat and reduce...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, likewise, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80102918741 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.025832034 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282224363015 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128906982656 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891716948562 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167539947679 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879574455071 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.