The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000

Essay topics:

The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000.

The given chart illustrates the percentage of total money which a European country spent over a period of 40 years in 5 categories, namely food, leisure, clothing, transport and fuel/energy.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that citizens in a certain European country spent the highest proportion of money on food for the first time in 1960. It is clear to see that while the percentage of expenditure in transport increased over the period shown, the others experienced the reverse pattern.
Looking at the graph, it is obvious to see that there was a significant decrease of nearly 20% in the proportion of expenditure in food over 40 years. A similar trend could be seen for leisure, with the figure dropping to 12%. In the meantime, the percentage of money which citizens spent on clothing dropped slightly to 5%.
When it comes to the others, there was only one dramatic increase in the proportion of expenditure in transport during 40 years, from under 10% to 15%, which was the highest percentage in 2002. In contrast, the year 2000 had witnessed a slight decline to about 3% in the figure for fuel/energy.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-10 taocute.s1 view
2022-09-25 manhabcd 78 view
2022-07-26 nhattram39 89 view
2022-07-25 nhattram39 89 view
2022-07-25 nhattram39 89 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85051546392 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76125605833 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3700903431 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217977667957 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831232501914 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801335763094 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130507878938 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596371328831 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.