The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how many trips prompt children to travel to and from school in one country over a period of 20 years, which was used by different means of transport, namely car passenger, walking, cycling, walking and bus and bus.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that children who went by foot was the highest number in 1990. It is clear to see that the number of car passengers was at least 4 times as high as that of cycling in 2010.
The number of car passengers has experienced an significant increase from more than 4 million to 11 million during 20 years. A reverse trend could be seen in the number of students who walked to commute to school. The figure for that was seen a significant decrease by 6 million.
2010 saw a significant decrease in the number of students who want to cycle to travel to and from school, a drop of 4 million. In the meantime, a similar trend could be seen in the number of students who opt for walking and bus and bus when the number of those declined dramatically to 3 million and 5 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...umber of car passengers has experienced an significant increase from more than 4 m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, at least, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42424242424 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58232476338 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.071711643 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19121849635 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863226887406 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670749849543 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125660819425 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601671447028 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.