The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country.
The graph displays the proportion of moviegoers in a certain country, grouped according to age.
Overall, age played a role in cinema attendance as younger age groups patronized the cinema more than those older than them.
The three younger age brackets had very similar movie-going trends, with the higher percentages throughout always belonging to whoever was younger among them. In 1978, 90% of the youth (14 to24-years old), 80% of the young adults (25 to 34 years old), and 60% of the middle-aged adults (35 to 49 years old) went to the movies. Despite a significant drop (15% to 20%) for all three groups in 1988, cinema attendance bounced back a decade later, with only the young adults (60%) not achieving their 1978 figure. However, between 2003 and and 2008, percentages for all three declined: the youth was still the highest with roughly 82%, followed by young adults with around 65%, and middle-aged adults ending at 50%.
Despite higher cinema attendance by the younger brackets, only the older (those aged 50 and above) had a general increase toward the end. In 1978, 40% of them went to the movies, but by 2008, this had risen to 49%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lollipop423 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 75
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country 73
- The charts below give information about the number of train passengers and the percentage of trains running on time from 2000 to 2009 in Japan 79
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country 78
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...heir 1978 figure. However, between 2003 and and 2008, percentages for all three decline...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82741116751 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4528641533 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2492038136 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169552650339 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833001116011 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063493872071 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130187335001 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559433823133 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.