The line graph and two pie charts illustrate the growth of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the region's population distribution in 1900 and 2000.
Overall, the size of the world's population witnessed a dramatic rose over 600 years, while the figure for Asia accounted for the highest proportion at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st.
Regarding the line graph, the global population numbers from a low of less than 500 million in 1400 to rise considerably to about 1.2 billion in 1700. During the remainder of the period, the rise was sharper, but only between 1700 and 1800, there was a dramatic decline which reached the point of less than 1 billion people. However, the population size increased significantly to hit its highest point of 6 billion people in 2000.
According to the two pie charts, they witnessed that the majority of the population lived in Asia, followed by Europe in both 1900 and 2000. As can be seen from the charts, the figure for Asia witnessed a slight decline as well as Europe from 60% to 54% and from 24% to 14% respectively. North America kept a balance of 5 % of the world population while in Africa and Latin America, there was a substantial growth from 3% to 8% and from 4.5% to 13% at the beginning of the 21st. The figure for other areas rose by 2.5% over the period. The most substantial changes in the percentage of residents were in Europe and Africa continents.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The line chart shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average house price in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 67
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...l population from 1400 to 2000, and the regions population distribution in 1900 and 200...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...900 and 2000. Overall, the size of the worlds population witnessed a dramatic rose ov...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62109375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58897301424 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50390625 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3340512761 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280607458262 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118768189866 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146354061481 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211544778138 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177570573774 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.