The line graph and two pie charts illustrate the growth of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the region population distribution in 1900 and 2000.
Overall, the size of the world population witnessed a dramatic rose over 600 years, while the figure for Asia accounted for the highest proportion at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st.
Regarding the line graph, the global population numbers from a low of less than 500 million in 1400 to about 1.2 billion in 1700. However, there was a dramatic decline to less than 1 billion people for the next 100 years. Conversely, the figure increased markedly to reach its peak of 6 billion people in 2000.
According to the two pie charts, they witnessed that most people lived in Asia, followed by Europe in both 1900 and 2000. As can be seen from the charts, the figure for Asia and Europe a slight decline from 60% to 54% and from 24% to 14% respectively. North America remained unchanged at 5% of the world population. By contrast, Africa and Latin America experienced a threefold at the beginning of the 21st, with 13% and 8% respectively. Finally, the percentage in other areas rose by 2.5% over the period.
- The graph below shows the average house price in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 67
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The first line graph shows the average world oil price for each year from 1970 to 2005 The second chart shows the top seven oil exporting countries and how much they export each day 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The line chart shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58797147818 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1757210016 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257539451369 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986188694757 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15072037374 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195662237309 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185598215512 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.