The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
The line graph illustrates the number of car thefts in four countries namely Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999.
Overall, it is clearly that all countries, except Sweden, had a tendency to decrease in car theft problems during the examined years.
Of all countries, Great Britain had the highest theft numbers with about 18 per thoundsand vehicles in 1990. Then, this figure had a fluctuation and fell slightly to around 16 per thounsand in 1999. Sweden was by far the second highest country, starting at just under 10 per thoundsand in 1990, it had a rise of about 10 per thoundsand in 1999.
Meanwhile, France was the lowest country about car theft issuses with just over 5 per thounsands in the first examined year, before increasing to approximately 8 per thoundsand and reached the same point with Sweden in 1991. However, France tend to decline the number of car theft to about 6 per thounsand in 1999. In addition, Canada stayed unchange between 1990 and 1991, followed by a decrease and a recovery in the remaining years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Daisy Ho | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-09-03 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (France) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...nt with Sweden in 1991. However, France tend to decline the number of car theft to a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88950276243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58727576995 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3887360535 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311736594339 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140587614157 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813410003534 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189334033202 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102760253447 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.