The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps given show changes that took place in the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and these days. Overall, it is apparent that the village used to be a greener place with less acomodation area.
In 1995, a great farmland and forest park were placed to the east of the village with a hotel in the left of the park. At the northwestern corner, a few houses were built while shops were placed in the south. Opposite the shops was a fish market with a small cafe on their right side. Besides, a fishing pod was built in the middle of the sea surface.
Nowadays, the village has undergone a few changes. The most noticeable one was the demolition of farmland and forest park to make way for a huge golf and tennis area. Further development was the expansion of the housing area and an additional car park placed next to the former hotel. While the cafe remains unchanged, the fish market was replaced with some apartments and the fishing pot was also removed.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 89
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50285714286 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33198872823 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.355727349 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101683547449 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457794598108 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684028306808 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856213293121 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686307514956 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.