Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Since the rapid growth of technology nowadays, it is not rare to see children using mobile phones at school. Hence, some people agree on forbidding students from using their moble devices while others still believe they should be allowed. In this essay I will discuss both points of view along with my personal opinion.
On the one hand, technological equipment can considerably affect student's study in class. This is because the internet offers such a wide range of entertainment resources that students find it hard to resist tempation. Therefore, they may illegally use their phones during lessons to serve personal purposes without teacher's notice. Since students are distracted from their studies, this behavior may bring further consequences and affect their academic achievements in the long term if not be dealt with soon. Another problem with phones is that sometimes sounds of notifications or calls are not turned off. As a result, noises cause disturbance to other classmates then not only the class is annoyed but the device's owner is also embarrassed.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that bringing phones to school also serve educational purposes. For instance, when students are required to do research during lessons, it would be the internet that provides them with useful source of information for their studies. Hence, it may be partially detrimental if putting a permanent ban on mobile phones at school.
In conclusion, although mobile devices have a few drawbacks when children bring them to school , they should not be completely banned. Instead, there should be restrictions on using phones in class so as to ensure the quality of academic achievements.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 RTroMT 78 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 84 view
2023-07-09 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-06-19 quang0612@1 61 view
2023-05-17 chesse 61 view
Essays by user Luci94 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...scuss both points of view along with my personal opinion. On the one hand, technological equipm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion, although mobile devices have a few drawbacks when children bring them...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...backs when children bring them to school , they should not be completely banned. I...
^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e restrictions on using phones in class so as to ensure the quality of academic achieve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on using phones in class so as to ensure the quality of academic achievements.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77962913875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.459524945 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395736685875 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120161882857 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842163980735 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254774595139 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945490293816 0.056905535591 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...scuss both points of view along with my personal opinion. On the one hand, technological equipm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion, although mobile devices have a few drawbacks when children bring them...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...backs when children bring them to school , they should not be completely banned. I...
^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e restrictions on using phones in class so as to ensure the quality of academic achieve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on using phones in class so as to ensure the quality of academic achievements.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77962913875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.459524945 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395736685875 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120161882857 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842163980735 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254774595139 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945490293816 0.056905535591 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.