The map below shows the village in 1995 and its appearance now.
The given map illustrates the modernization of a village from 1995 to the present.
It is evident from the map that the purpose of this renovation work is to transform the village into a recreational area. Additionally, some amenities have been erected to meet the demands of the inhabitants.
In the western area of the village, in 1995, there were houses situated alongside with a road whose location has not undergone any changes throughout the research time. At the same time, adjacent to the houses was a block of houses, whereas currently, some of them and a road have been constructed to the west of it. Likewise, the shop and the fish market located in the southwest corner have been pulled down to make way for the introductions of a restaurant and apartments respectively, accompanied by the disappearance of the fishing port.
To the east of the village, while the farmland has been converted into a golf, there has been the erection of a tennis at the position where the forest park used to be. In addition, the hotel and the café in the southeast area has remained unchanged, compared to the available plot of land next to the hotel that has been used to build a car park.
- The diagram below shows how the orange juice is produced 73
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People are responsible for their happiness Others feel happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The graph and the table below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1994 to 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7033492823 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82381789124 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5686295603 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104033529956 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545649837585 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771654595659 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909548605708 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873952894763 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.