Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a contentious debate surrounding the effectiveness of increasing the minimum legal age for driving as a means to enhance road safety. While some experts argue in favor of this approach, I believe that there are alternative methods that also play a significant role in promoting traffic safety.
On one hand, proponents of raising the minimum driving age offer compelling reasons to support their view. They contend that older individuals tend to exhibit greater maturity and responsibility in adhering to traffic regulations. This can be exemplified by the observation that Vietnamese drivers aged 18 and above demonstrate a higher level of respect for traffic signals, such as stopping when the light is red or reducing speed when the light turns yellow. Consequently, the frequency and likelihood of accidents could be reduced. Furthermore, drivers who surpass the minimum age requirement may have accumulated substantial experience in handling various vehicle-related challenges. For instance, a truck driver who is over 20 years old would possess the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively control the vehicle in the event of brake failure, thereby minimizing the potential for catastrophic accidents.
On the other hand, there are alternative approaches that can be equally effective in improving road safety. Firstly, authorities should impose higher fines for traffic rule violations. For example, the Vietnamese government has implemented policies that increase the penalties for driving under the influence. As a result, individuals are motivated to comply with the rules in order to avoid exorbitant fines, leading to a significant decrease in the number of accidents. Additionally, it is worth considering the requirement for individuals to attend mandatory traffic courses before obtaining a driving license. Such courses provide comprehensive knowledge and skills necessary for safe driving. By participating in these classes, individuals not only gain a deeper understanding of the importance of adhering to traffic rules but also acquire the competence to handle various driving challenges effectively.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable that raising the minimum legal driving age may have positive effects on improving road safety, I believe it is essential to explore and implement alternative strategies. By imposing stricter fines for traffic violations and implementing mandatory traffic courses, we can make significant strides in reducing accidents and ensuring safer roads for everyone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76657824934 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18834215297 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570291777188 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8191191881 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.882352941 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181561718052 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612223877515 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662800436594 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127799850476 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379057047408 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.