The map show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010
The map illustrates the process of urbanization that took place in Stokeford village between 1930 and 2010. Generally, it can be seen clearly from the map that major changes in the area involved the introduction of housing accommodation, the disappearance of agricultural lands, and the transformation of some green space.
During the period given, the whole village was split into two major parts by a main road that ran through the area from north to south. On the north eastern part of the village in 1930 was the region for crops and livestock, which was then replaced to give way to rows of houses running along a newly built access road, diverting from the main road. Moreover, on the right side of the main road in 2010, while the post office was left unchanged, another access road with residential homes on both sides was added in place of the shopping area.
Next, further modernization is noticeable in the southern part of Stokeford village. In 2010, a populous inhabited zone occupied the region on the right bank of Stoke River, which was devoted to farming activities in 1930. Additionally, the green garden and large houses, located in the south-eastern area in 1930, were transformed into housing blocks and residential homes for retired people. The region was made accessible to the main road by a newly constructed pathway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-13 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hanbnguyenle | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | NajlaM | view | |
| 2022-11-03 | Jamjam23 | 84 | view |
- The map show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 78
- The graph shows the proportion of population aged 65 or more in Japan Sweden and USA between 1940 and 2040 84
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- In some countries, teenagers are allowed to do part-time jobs. Some people think it is a good thing but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96017699115 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76674661567 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570796460177 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3490965807 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21075245747 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102615666911 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130394206568 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168660495422 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909832164131 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.