The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present

The two diagrams delineate renovations to a residence hall since 2010 to today.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that five mainly changes have been made to student accommodation, mainly related to infrastructure development.

As is presented in the two diagrams, the layout was designed in 2010 and included three study/bedrooms, one living room, one kitchen, one bathroom, one hallway, and three garden patches. Firstly, the hallway was directly accessible from the main southeast entrance. Opposite it were the study/bedroom and the kitchen to the east, another bedroom was located to the northeast and the remaining one was to the west. Besides that, the bathroom and the living room were along the corridor leading to the end of the building. Subsequently, garden patches were outside the building to the north and south.

At present, the main entrance remains unchanged, the main hall is reduced in size to make way for an en-suite room, which is connected with the student bedroom to the southeast. The kitchen is expanding its size to serve as a social area for residents. As a result, the living room and the garden in the northern corner of the building were demolished to make way for two new study/bedrooms. Another major change to the student accommodation has been the construction of a carpark, replacing the garden patch to the south.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, look, so, as to, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96712522465 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.375100747 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109221543612 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413620111252 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625999092517 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901642665385 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741731651677 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.