Map shows construction of 2014 and planning of 2020

Essay topics:

Map shows construction of 2014 and planning of 2020

The maps represent the town square and its nearby area in 2014 and its proposed expansion in 2020.
Overall, it is conspicuous that the plan is to develop more shops and extend bars and restaurants. However, some of the buildings will be replaced by new architecture such as the museum will become an art gallery.
In 2014, the fountain is placed in the center of the town and the bandstand is to the east of the fountain. The town square consists of a library adjacent to the history museum. On the south of fountain, fish restaurant and bar is located whereas, fish market and town hall are on the opposite side of the bar. The administrative building is attached to the bar and town hall.
According to the proposed plan for 2020, only the fountain and town hall will remain from the original site. The most significant development would be the construction of covered seating, children’s playground and plant beds in empty space nearby the fountain. However, local artists’ gallery will overtake land previously occupied by history museums, whereas bars and restaurants will be extended in the place of library and some part of administrative buildings and remaining part of administrative offices will be constructed into multiple shops. The fish market will be converted into a supermarket which is on the left of the town hall.

Votes
Average: 8 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-13 lethianhthu 73 view
2023-07-01 mylinh3001 73 view
2023-06-09 hanbnguyenle 78 view
2022-12-21 NajlaM view
2022-10-13 Hanabi 61 view
Essays by user krishyparms :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d extend bars and restaurants. However, some of the buildings will be replaced by new archi...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94690265487 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84887036182 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7093977863 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12912045695 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507602517966 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622047589279 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898107675793 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683794029391 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.