The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005

The two pictures compare the layout of the Templeton's seaside resort as it was in the year 1990 and the changes in 2005.

It is clear that the main change in 2005, the seaside resort of Templetion is more industrial and it also had more housing, so the place were able to accomodate a considerably larger number of people.

In 1990, the seaside ressort was seen more green and it had a railway station and parking area in the east, a hospital and a school in the North-east, a lake, some houses and trees, and a big house in the North-west and in the south-west side, it had an apartement building, housing and greenspace areas. The western side and eastern side was separated by a sea-flow path and connected by two bridges.

In 2005, there were a big change in that location, as some buldings were built. The housing, an apartement building and trees in the South area was cleared to make areas for supermarket and some apartement buildings to the south-west of the seaside ressort and a factory building and a port for ferry to the south-east. In addition, some housing buildings to accomodate more workers constructed in the original site of a big house in the south of the lake and a house and trees between the lake and the canal. Some trees had to cut down as well to to give space for an airport building in the north-east of school and some houses in the north-west of hospital. To accomodate more people, some houses was built in a small area along the western of canal.

However, school, hospital, parking, railway station building and two bridges on the canal remained unchanged, while the railway was extended not only available to the north-west direction but then in 2005 were constructed along the northern side and crossed the canal.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...nal. Some trees had to cut down as well to to give space for an airport building in t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, then, well, while, as for, in addition, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 6.8 324% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 310.0 196.424390244 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68709677419 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61003626067 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432258064516 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9573878947 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11770881446 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665179054537 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923414709846 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112559498202 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107972723308 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.