The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town calles Darwin between 2009 and 2014

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town calles Darwin between 2009 and 2014.

The maps Illustrate the development of the waterfront area of a town called Darwin from 2009 to 2014. 

It is evident that the area underwent significant redevelopment, notably the replacement of industrial areas to other facilities and the addition of a new harbor and various residential buildings. 

Over the course of 5 years the 2 industrial areas in the center of the waterfront were demolished. The smaller industrial zone, surrounded by a footpath, was replaced with a swimming pool. The larger one, after being removed, made room for various trees and a university. In addition, the residential areas inside the old industrial zone also expanded with an addition of 3 more buildings. In the South East bank, there was an installation of a new harbor. Along with the appearance of the harbor, a footpath was built from the main road which crossed the green space, providing access to the new harbor. 

Regarding other facilities they remained unchanged over the period. The school, convention center, fishing area in the north along with the lake and 2 swimming pools nearby stayed the same.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-22 myhang1903 view
2022-12-20 snowacealex 73 view
2021-11-30 jjjjjj 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a town called Darwin from 2009 to 2014.  It is evident that the area underwent si...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arbor and various residential buildings.  Over the course of 5 years the 2 industr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace, providing access to the new harbor.  Regarding other facilities they remained...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, as to, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14364640884 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92721760585 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 112.054651389 43.030603864 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118009561899 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414515782961 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745528651367 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119946773218 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141828393672 0.0819641961636 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.