The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.

The manifested map of a city going through some miscellaneous variations, e.g., establishing a power damp hydraulically working with electricity, during a fifth of a century commencing from 1990 is evinced, here.

Regarding the left figure, it can be seen that in 1990, the city was bifurcated by a river meanderingly passing through town from the north to the south. Apart from existing some mountainous areas in each corner of the city, on the right side of the city between mountains, there were villages and farmlands. And on the other side, there were forest, ancient structure as well as an area for keeping rare flora and fauna.

Turning to the dextral side figure, it can be found that in 2010, a hydroelectric power dam was constructed upstream, leading to the formation of a lake in which a boat and a number of fishes can be seen. Furthermore, in lieu of villages, which were displaced to south of the city, and farmlands, razed to the ground, a modest establishment, i.e., a hotel, was created. Moreover, on either side of the river, one could find some sources of electricity.

Overall, according to the map of changes of the aforementioned city, we can say apart from shifting the place of the village, providing a hotel and lake and the annihilation of south mountains, their town lost rare animals and plant, on top of that, its antediluvian structure.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-24 hagiang123. 78 view
2023-07-10 Sella 78 view
2023-07-10 Sella 61 view
2023-07-02 TLan168 84 view
2023-07-02 TLan168 81 view
Essays by user ata :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, apart from, as well as, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96260818608 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58547008547 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0717749855 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.25 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123423244179 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043377632806 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505726715234 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707410474066 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299563248936 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.