The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site
The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site
The map illustrates the manufacturing area of Norbiton in its current situation and its redevelop plan.
Overall, the industrial area is planned to develop more houses, play area, school and medical facilities to the Norbiton area people by changing these factories.
At present, there are factories on the roundabout and there is a farmland to opposite of the river. However, these factories are removed and planned to develop.
Additionally, they demolished the factories and planned to make bridge between the river make house there near the farmland while, they also construct play area to the east of the roundabout and also construct some shops to the west. Moreover, they plan to build school at the end and it is clear that, they also planned to construct second round about to the south and also contrast medical center opposite to the second roundabout. They also panned more houses near the play area road.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 56
- The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 61
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07236842105 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59926708986 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1977175511 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206958506155 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10877004175 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896037114685 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154479886989 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838672305882 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.