The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates that how many visitors visits museum of three different countries such as MET in New York, Edo in Tokyo and National in China over a period from 2000 to 2005.The number of visitors were in millions.
Overall, what stands out that in MET museum the number of visitors fluctuated in 2000 to 2005 but its valve remained stale between two years that is 2001 and 2002. However, in 2005 the number of people who visits MET was 14 million. Another, interesting point is that National museum of China was the most popular museum over this period (2000 to 2005).
Following, from the bar graph the number of visitors who visited the Edo museum was approximately 13 million between 2000 and 2001 while its valve was sharply decreased in 2002 and 2003 and then it shows increased.
However, the number of visitors who visited National museum in China increased in 2000 to 2005 as approximately 7 million to 17 million while, in 2003 and 2004 number of visitors remained same that is approximately 11 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Dua5 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Sadullayev Nodirbek | 82 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | lethaianh | 87 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | lethaianh | 55 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 61
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 73
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 61
- The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site The maps below show an industrial area in town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...n China over a period from 2000 to 2005.The number of visitors were in millions. O...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76966292135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52127045284 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.353227002 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261713678903 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149334233822 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388701192568 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180129476775 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216189981316 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.