The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The geography maps illustrate the establishment of the island before and after the renovation of the visitors’ equipment.
It can be clearly seen that the space of the island is extended after the reconstruction. Overall, there is a paradise for tourism now.
Before the development, there were just a few trees on the island, which was around 200 meters width, as well as a beach on the left side with no any use.
there was a huge change after reestablishment. Firstly, a number of roads were designed, not only set the vehicle track between the restaurant, the reception on the middle and the ferry pier on the below but also placed the footpath to connect the several accommodations as far as the two circles on the middle and the west of the island. Moreover, the beach on the west was connected with the west households, so that the inhabitants may swam via the narrow footpath. Finally, visitors saw an incredible view at the pier through the reception as soon as they wanted to take a photo with two sweeps. And please reminded that there was no building on the east.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extend do you agree? 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...s well as a beach on the left side with no any use. there was a huge change after...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...each on the left side with no any use. there was a huge change after reestablishment...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, may, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71578947368 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8412084355 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7894727315 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166213515921 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643611991696 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067735322743 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113347799022 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645542725342 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.