The maps below show the structure of a museum in 1957 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps show alterations occurred in the setting of a museum between the two years 1957 and 2007.
As can be seen from the maps, the main building of this museum saw a complete change in the way it was constructed previously.
In 1957, the majority of this area was covered with trees which were also planted along one side of the main road. The museum entrance was at the end of a tortuous path, erected in the middle of its front. Meanwhile, inside the building, there was one large room allocated for the country's history exhibitions. The other two, however, were smaller and were used for local displays and storing purposes.
When it came to 2007, the museum main building was remarkably expanded to the north with an adding shop located to the Southwest where the entrance was placed. The local history room was also relocated to be the main part of the museum as the national displays were removed. At the same time, there was an increase in the size of the store-room and it was then utilized to serve food and drinks. 2007 also saw the construction of a new reception area, an education center as well as a room for special exhibitions. Likewise, the garden outside and the row of trees were cleared on a large scale in order to make room for visitors' cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, likewise, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55217391304 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41493854298 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.9866801038 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136327993454 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576704625998 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603817150587 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105952005835 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653861533017 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.