The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

These maps depict the development which occurred in Stokeford village from 1930 to 2010.
It is clear that the gap that the village had an increase in its residential capacity through a rapid house construction.

Based on what is shown, the eastern part of Stokeford had developed entirely. Near the bridge, the farmland was diminished, and new houses were built across an extension of the main road. Just below that, the primary school was extended, making it almost double its size in 1930. While a part of the gardens was converted to another extension of the road alongside with additional rows of residential units, the left-over was utilized for altering the large house into a larger retirement home complex.

In the western area of the main road, the shops in 1930 had turned into a more residential area. While the post office remained untouched, the southern farmland was replaced with a square, bordered by newly constructed housing units.

To sum up, we could say that although many changes took place in the village, the bridge and River Stoke were not changed, and the other side of the river remained empty.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-28 taoxanh99 80 view
2024-06-27 taoxanh99 78 view
2024-06-26 Zahid6400 67 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
Essays by user mbr926 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96315789474 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53260729743 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647368421053 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0605643783 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124635314785 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058104161804 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693923193584 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767085281684 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789748573233 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.