Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future, and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? What role should traditions have in our lives?
The future is not determined by the past, as they are distinct periods of time. People in each era try to find new ways to make their lives easier even though they may face some obstacles, such as holding tight to traditions. In this essay, I will express the appeal of getting rid of culture for a better future. I totally agree with this notion, and this essay will discuss the roles that tradition should have in the modern world.
I extremely agree that people accept changes have a better life than those who are not. Closed-minded people always reject new ways of doing a task, an example of which is a tribe in Germany, which still rejects using electricity; they use candles as a way to combat the darkness. If they had been using power, as it is an innovation, they would not have stayed in the dark.
Also, had they rejected the tradition against new ways of lighting, their lives would be more sophisticated and more comfortable than what they are now. Therefore, they could not make their life easy, so no nation will ask them to solve a problem. Consequently, their income, as a community or a country, is low.
On the other side of the coin, customs slows us, as human, and builds layers of barriers. People embrace the change without looking at what people in the past have done. Take China, for instance, they are open-minded, and they accept nearly every new way of doing things and, unsurprisingly, it is one of the largest countries when it comes to revenue as they rejected the old thinking. They have the latest technology, which opens a new horizon for them as a country by neglecting conventions.
In conclusion, getting rid of traditions that are blocking the country's progress will open a bright door for a nation's prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | Blackcytrus | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | NeutronnzZ | 56 | view |
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- It is sometimes said that travel broadens the mind To what extent do you agree or disagree with this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... progress will open a bright door for a nations prosperity.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68387096774 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5900152471 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4748814661 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163935686014 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059300182591 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633988000397 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983003876056 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046076013891 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.