The maps show the change of Petland from 1980 to 2007.
The maps elucidate the development of Petland, over thirteen years periods from 1980 to 2007.
Overall, there have been tremendous changes in Petland compared to the past, and the noticeable modifications were the construction of a new cinema, shelters, swimming pool, and a park in this period.
To begin with, there was a colossal sea in the north of a city in 1980, however, its name modified to Yacht Marina in 2007. Subsequently, in the past, the lands near the sea were uninhabited, but a park is built on the left side of Yacht Marina, and the new apartments constructed on the right side of that sea in 2007. There was an industrial area in the north-west of the roads in 1980, then, a swimming pool and multi-story car park replaced its location at the end of the year.
Moreover, many shops are established in the north-east of the main road, where was located parking area in 1980. The place in the south-west of the highways was empty in the last years, however, a new cinema is built in this area in 2007. Then, the grassland was situated in the south-west of the main road in 1980, but more modern houses are discovered in that place in 2007.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Successful companies use advertisements to make more sales What can make an advertisement effective Do you think advertisements are a bad thing or a good thing for society 78
- The diagram shows the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 95
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Successful companies use advertisements to make more sales What can make an advertisement effective Do you think advertisements are a bad thing or a good thing for society 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65438609335 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.224128699 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237662274592 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114163216038 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114022048069 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175337630952 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133880544031 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.