The maps show the information about changes of Kingsville city since 2002

The maps reveal the developments which occur in the city of Kimsville from 2002 until now.
Overall, the city has witnessed various transformations, most notably with the construction of more residential, commercial, entertainment, and sports facilities.
The most noticeable is that the trees west were cut down and have been turned into a new apartment in the north and a football stadium in the south corner. Moreover, a new train station has been erected between them.
The old cinema located in the south of the city center has been demolished to make way for a pub, whereas the shopping center and city center still remain. All of the trees east of the plans have also remained the same with no changes. Further development is the factory next to the city center was pulled down, replaced by a software company.
In conclusion, a comparison of the two maps presents a major change from a less developed town to a modernized town.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The maps reveal the developments which o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city of Kimsville from 2002 until now. Overall, the city has witnessed various ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entertainment, and sports facilities. The most noticeable is that the trees we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation has been erected between them. The old cinema located in the south of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ng center and city center still remain. All of the trees east of the plans have also remai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... down, replaced by a software company. In conclusion, a comparison of the two m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, still, whereas, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8362607426 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0867011515 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136890393205 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055152146833 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575934993038 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077857688215 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059729393613 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.