Many might blame the increasing number of road accidents on lenient fines; and therefore, harsher punishments should be imposed to ensure traffic safety. I entirely concur with this view, but to consider this as the only solution, in my opinion, does not seem perfectly reasonable as there are many other effective measures that could also be taken.
On the one hand, it is true that stricter punishments can solve the problem of road accidents because the most common reason for traffic accidents today comes from drivers’ irresponsibility when they exceed the speed limit or use mobile phones while driving. If people know that they might receive more severe sanctions when violating the law, they are likely to become law-abiding citizens and take more responsibilities for their driving. This, therefore, results in a decrease in the number of crashes.
On the other hand, I believe that this is not the only method to enhance traffic safety because having more surveillance cameras installed on roads is also another viable solution. Stricter punishment only ensures road safety at the places where there is a traffic officer but fails to guarantee law-abiding behaviors among traffic participants everywhere. For this reason, if drivers are aware that their actions are constantly monitored by camera systems and they can be punished later on if breaking the traffic laws, they certainly do not take risks.
In conclusion, heavier punishment is undoubtedly a promising measure to reduce the number of traffic accidents, but I believe that there are other solutions that can also deal with this problem.
- The maps show the information about changes of Kingsville city since 2002 73
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses What extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 and 2005
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
Many might blame the increasing number of road acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25581395349 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74923986085 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589147286822 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6164124093 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112980081344 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509841994181 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433339196913 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677266056229 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456176345912 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.