The maps show recent changes in the town of Kimsville
The two maps highlight the main changes, which have taken place in the town of Kimsville between the year 2002 and today.
Overall, what stands out from the maps is that Kimsville has become a much more modern city, with far more transport and leisure facilities.
First of all, in 2002, there was not a train station, but it has been built in the west part of the city. Another striking change is that the factory has been knocked down to make way for software company buildings. Also, completely new apartments has been constructed near the shopping centre in the north-west of the city.
If we look at the south, it has been modernized since 2002, and a range of entertainment facilities have been opened, such as a football stadium and a pub. The south-west of the city used to be a green area, with lots of trees, but the trees have been cut down, and the new football stadium has been introduced. A final noticeable transformation is related to the old cinema, which has been turned into the pub.
- This table shows the class numbers by level at Mother Tongue Language School Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Proficiency 25 Advanced 25 Upper Intermediate 50 Intermediate 200 Pre Intermediate 100 Elementary 90 Beginn 88
- The pictures show how tomato ketchup is made. 78
- UK s most popular seaside towns 1960 Blackpool 100 thousands of visitors Margate 75 Bournemouth 60 Great Yarmouth 50 St Ives 25 Eastbourne 20 89
- The maps show recent changes in the town of Kimsville 66
- The pictures show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62222222222 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52371468325 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3717102732 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10276308478 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448794136526 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671968579989 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825027976238 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746842179899 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.