The paragraph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Essay topics:

The paragraph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The provided graph compares the consume of fish and three other types of meat such as: beef, lamb and chicken in a country that is located in Europe from 1979 to 2004. At a glance fish consumption remains the same during the period. On the other hand, beef and lamb decreased sharply, although beef graph increased at first. The only increase in consuming the meat belongs to chicken, which rose rapidly between 1979 and 2004. By comparing the beef and the lamb, it shows that beef reached a peak in 80's which the consumption is around 25 grams per person per week, but after a while it dropped slightly, although the consumption increased minimally after 1989 by consuming 100 grams per person weekly. The lamb consumption decreased sharply by 1979 and the graph shows the alter in consuming of the lamb by passing the time. It hit to the highest point in 1979 by 150 grams per person and reached to the lowest point around 2000 by more than 50 grams per person. The fish graph depicts that consuming of the fish didn't face with significant alter, and mostly were stable from 1979 to 2004. On the other hand chicken consumption increased sharply and reached on a peak around 2000 which show 250 gram per person per week. Above all, consumers tendency for chicken increased by the time and they decided to consume less beef and lamb during the period. On the other hand, fish consumption didn't have many changes by passing the time.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-22 mary.ssherr 67 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-02 happyhappy 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The provided graph compares the consume of fish and three other types of meat s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 771, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sed sharply by 1979 and the graph shows the alter in consuming of the lamb by passing the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1015, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...raph depicts that consuming of the fish didnt face with significant alter, and mostly...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1197, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ed on a peak around 2000 which show 250 gram per person per week. Above all, consume...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...od. On the other hand, fish consumption didnt have many changes by passing the time.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64173228346 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26788398879 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452755905512 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7131961255 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.181818182 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184269420954 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894271255008 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624383977249 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184269420954 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.