the percentage of children in two different elementary schools faced with several types of educational problems.
In the report of the survey in 2005 and 2015, the given table provides the percentage of children in two different elementary schools faced with several types of educational problems.
Overall, the rate of issues at school A has reduced significantly after 10 years. While in school B, there were only a few changes in figures, even in a negative way.
In 2005, it is transparent that the percentages of educational problems in school A were higher than school B. Noticeably, the "Following instruction" problem was at the highest rate, account for 42%, followed by other issues that vary from 22% to 40%. Nevertheless, in school B, the greatest trouble against the students was the "Concentration in lessons" with 15%, other issues were no more than 20%.
In 2015, these problems namely "Following instruction" and "Concentration in lessons" at school A have dropped dramatically at more than a half, the rest issues decreased by 5% to 10% approximately. According to school B data, some aspects such as "Spelling", "Reading ability", etc, mounted up, about 1 to 2% in the difference. Additionally, "Handwriting" and "Concentration in lessons" problems remained at the same rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ere only a few changes in figures, even in a negative way. In 2005, it is transparent that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61458333333 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.1954086801 2.65546596893 158% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0446222677 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231235134208 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129331166226 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178358958916 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213050080383 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221308583846 0.0819641961636 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.