Percentage of food budget spent on. Restaurant meals or home cooking

Essay topics:

Percentage of food budget spent on. Restaurant meals or home cooking

The given circular charts or linear chart depicts the information about restaurant meal or home cooking ,and fast food vs. sit down restaurant during the year 1970 to 2000. The data was calibrated in percentum or number. It was clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that , in circular charts in 1970 year food budget spent on restaurant meals only one in ten or 90% on home cooking.the next year budget increased on restaurant meals that was less than two fifth or cooking budget decreased five per cent . Moving further , in next 20 year restaurant meal budget grow one fifth in 1990 ,and half in year 2000. The cooking budget downfall in 20 year .
It was crystal clear, the fast food meals and sit down restaurant meal start from same number that was 20 in year 1970. while, both were minor grow in 1980, that was near 30. Further more fast food meals grow sharply in year 1990 to 2000 that was reached the almost 90 ,and sit down restaurant meals was around the 20 year grow only 45.
Overall, it was evident that budget spent on restaurant meals was rapidly increased or fast food meal was also in year 2000 on the peak.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-27 taoxanh99 73 view
2024-06-26 unstoppable 67 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
2024-06-22 Zahid6400 67 view
Essays by user Jhand raman :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cular charts or linear chart depicts the information about restaurant meal or hom...
^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on about restaurant meal or home cooking ,and fast food vs. sit down restaurant du...
^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rently represented. It can be seen that , in circular charts in 1970 year food bu...
^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r cooking budget decreased five per cent . Moving further , in next 20 year restau...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...decreased five per cent . Moving further , in next 20 year restaurant meal budget ...
^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...urant meal budget grow one fifth in 1990 ,and half in year 2000. The cooking budge...
^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.... The cooking budget downfall in 20 year . It was crystal clear, the fast food me...
^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n restaurant meal start from same number that was 20 in year 1970. while, both we...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... same number that was 20 in year 1970. while, both were minor grow in 1980, that was...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...0 to 2000 that was reached the almost 90 ,and sit down restaurant meals was around...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56585365854 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24940437873 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.306417363 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331102704986 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143153251751 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117458094664 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240220579157 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752795707249 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.