percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions
The given line graph clearly presents the percentage of tourists to England who visited the attractions in Brighton during the period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010. The 4 mentioned attractions include art gallery, pavilion, pier, and festival. Overall, it is evident that there are 3 general trend: an upward, a downward, and a stable.
In detail, it can be explained that the trend of pavilion was upward because it gradual rise from 20% in 1980 to 48 % in 1995 and then moderate decline to 30% in 2010. Similarly, the pier’s trend; it climbed slightly from 10% in 1980 to 20% in 2010. On the other hand, the downward trend belonged to art gallery; there were gentle increase by 15% in 1985 and then it decreased gradually to 8% in 2010.
Finally, it is compelling that the festival experienced the stable trend since there was constant at 30% throughout the period in 30 years
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 73
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012. 56
- The Graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in anEnglish town in 2012 67
- percentage of free-time spent with family form 1950 to 2000 67
- percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
... it is evident that there are 3 general trend: an upward, a downward, and a stable. ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'trend' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'trends'.
Suggestion: trends
... it is evident that there are 3 general trend: an upward, a downward, and a stable. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at 30% throughout the period in 30 years
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, similarly, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72258064516 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62789241417 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8887168899 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162601448598 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785595602255 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164763843584 0.0843802449381 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126648882203 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179108566871 0.0819641961636 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.