Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates information about the proportion of UK citizens who ate an advised amount of fruit and vegetables in three different years 2002 to 2010.
Overall, the male citizen of the united kingdom had eaten more fruit and vegetables than women and children while children ate less amount than others. The trend between men, women, and children fluctuated in three years. However, they consumed a large proportion in 2006.
Male was the primary consumer in each year. in 2002 25 % of the proportion of fruit and vegetables was eaten by males, next year, it increased about 7% and reached 32 5 at the highest level. In last year, decreased at 26% of the proportion. While women follow a similar trend and in2002 it was 22%, next year it was reached at 26%. Last year in the graph, the proportion of women was 24%.
Children follow the same trend as other genders, start from 11%, touched the peak of 18% of the proportion and after decreased at 16% of the proportion of vegetable and fruit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-27 | TranMinhDuc | view | |
| 2021-10-08 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | Sahithi V9 | view | |
| 2021-01-29 | coleengg | view |
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 67
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey consumed a large proportion in 2006. Male was the primary consumer in each ye...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... was the primary consumer in each year. in 2002 25 % of the proportion of fruit an...
^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by males, next year, it increased about 7% and reached 32 5 at the highest leve...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...males, next year, it increased about 7% and reached 32 5 at the highest level. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71751412429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48444853736 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9719921556 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135299684199 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572658268446 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678924177928 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10206623788 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076722022367 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.