It is increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
In recent years, an approach has risen their popularity in students who are more interested in getting a free year from shifting schools to higher education. This essay will highlight the benefits and drawbacks that result from such an approach.
To begin with advantages, after spending a long time in schools, learners need a refresh brack. In this brack, pupils have a period to free time his body and mind without any pressure they usually feel in school life. Twelve years of school education without any bracks raise some depression situation that helps to destroy students' future lives. Besides refreshing their minds, students also have time to find a more exciting field. Students have time to travel around their country and world, which gives a bundle of information to students to analyze different majors of study.
Nevertheless, taking a gap between the switch from schools to universities has cons for some students. If the student has ample free time to enjoy and disconnect from his studies, they might have significant chances to forget his fundamental concepts. In addition, when they use that time to enjoy clubs and parties making new friends, maybe students are involved in drugs. For instance, research conducted by an international organization proves that most students who take brack between study do not attend universities. Most young drug adapters came to form this category.
In conclusion, after loge time spending in schools students need a refreshing brack to avoid some mental illness and take some experiences although it has some negative aspects that help to go out of track.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | fdsugb22 | 11 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | abdul rahim | 63 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | thiennguyen135 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | 22rashmi | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | hieutrungpham7201 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University 78
- Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today What are the causes of this problem What are some possible solutions 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...g a long time in schools, learners need a refresh brack. In this brack, pupils have a per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to analyze different majors of study. Nevertheless, taking a gap between the s...
^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ug adapters came to form this category. In conclusion, after loge time spending...
^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to form this category. In conclusion, after loge time spending in schools stud...
^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e aspects that help to go out of track.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, nevertheless, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17557251908 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64032769596 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618320610687 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1846959647 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143849913166 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533620963717 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383378124332 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852421519723 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197678574874 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.