The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025.
The maps give information how to promotes of the conference centre from 2010 to 2025.
It is clear that, the conference centre witness radical change with the most noticeable being the car park and hall in main entrance.
The conference centre was designed in 2010 and included two rooms, hall, one car park, a reception, two garden. The reception directly access two rooms and next to is the hall. Look at the map in 2025, the centre have the garden is replaced by car park located convenient way for people, the residence hall and hall at the top of car park.
While the reception remain in middle, it becomes noticeable narrower, and go to the bottom of garden we will see IT centre first. Meanwhile, compared in 2010, today the centre has residence hall ( 20 room), two room, hall, two meeting room, one music and game room, canteen and kitchen. Besides, the garden in 2010 empty and don’t have other area. However, in 2025 this centre have many area including: IT centre next to canteen, and next to meeting room. Finally, game and music room need to car park. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features can be seen that, centre have few places than in 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-28 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
2023-06-28 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
2023-03-11 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
2022-10-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2022-08-06 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 87 | view |
- Some people say in order to prevent illness and disease government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps illustrate the centre in small town build and planned development Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Have many people choose live and work abroad because higher of living and find outside their country Do you think it bring advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reason for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...010, today the centre has residence hall 20 room, two room, hall, two meeting roo...
^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'many areas'.
Suggestion: many areas
...area. However, in 2025 this centre have many area including: IT centre next to canteen, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...his centre have many area including: IT centre next to canteen, and next to meeting ro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68571428571 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33331389691 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6964316954 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191535423476 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878191943171 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721758308675 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152443469626 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069693604548 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.